![]() ![]() Sands claims that Menard, his various companies and trusts owe her a stake for the work she did while she was Menard's live-in partner from 1998 to 2006, as well as millions in legal fees she said she earned.īut in a 5-2 decision, the Supreme Court distinguished the Sands-Menard enterprise from those of a case that set out when one person is unjustly enriched by the efforts of the partner. Sands, who suffered the same legal losses in Eau Claire County Circuit Court and last year at the Court of Appeals. The third time was not the charm for Debra K. ![]() John Menard Jr., founder of the Menards store chain, doesn't owe his ex-fiancée a dime of his billions, the state's Supreme Court ruled Friday. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |